David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:02:33AM +0000, Purbeck Consultancy wrote:>> ldd /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/soffice.bin | grep -v '=> >> /\(opt/gnome\|lib\|usr/lib\|usr/X11R6/lib\)'>> ...>> Is this showing errors? I don't know. What output should I expect from >> this command?> > If run on something else than a monster like OpenOffice> (moreover evidently not installed from SuSE package so> possibly coming with its own set of problems), it should> print only the ld-linux line. Please try these things on> something simple and predictable, e.g. gtk-demo. But the> other libs are `expected' too in this case.OK, here is the output from ldd /opt/gnome/bin/gtk-demo | grep -v '=> /\(opt/gnome\|lib\|usr/lib\|usr/X11R6/lib\)' linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0x4002c000) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x40043000) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x400c5000) libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x403b8000) libXi.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x403bc000) libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x403c4000) libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x403c7000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x403d1000) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0x403d6000) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0x403dd000) libpango-1.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x40402000) libatk-1.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x4043a000) libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x40453000) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x4048e000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40491000) libglib-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x40495000) libcairo.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0x4051d000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x4056a000) libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x4059a000) libexpat.so.0 => /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0 (0x40609000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x40629000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40631000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x4072a000) libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x40738000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x40777000) libglitz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libglitz.so.1 (0x4078b000) libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x407af000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x407d5000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) > >> I still get the pixbuf errors. However, I cannot see any associated >> problems when using the various applications - they all appear to be >> running correctly.> > So all the icons/images are displayed normally?> As far as I am able to tell, yes. Nothing appears to be missing.> Then you have to make it crash and print the backtrace, as> suggested.Will try but not sure how to generate a backtrace, although I have installed the gtk-debuginfo packages and can run gtk-demo with the --g-fatal-warnings arg, and crash it by running the Menus demo and selecting Flip.> >> Sorry if I'm appearing obtuse or missing something obvious here, but I'm >> definitely not a programmer and don't really understand how GTK fits >> into the Gnome/Application structure.> > Gtk+ is a library -- one that essentially all Gnome programs> use because it provides the user interface widget toolkit.> >> For example, do I still need any >> GTK1 files if I have GTK2 installed?> > No.> >> Would having both installed cause >> problems?> > No.> Thanks very much.> Yeti> > > --> Whatever.> _______________________________________________> gtk-list mailing list> gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list> -- Jeremy MorrisIT ConsultantPurbeck Consultancy LtdTel: 01202 575315Mob: 07867 807284_______________________________________________gtk-list mailing listgtk-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
