--- David Neèas (Yeti) <yeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:50:47PM -0500, zentara wrote: > > > > I've tried printing G_PI with the %Lf.20 format and I'm still stuck with > > 15 decimal places of accuracy. > > The definition of G_PI is IMO a bit misguided. It has 50 > decimal digits, but I cannot imagine how this excessive > precision could be used (except putting it into a string and > parsing that) because long double literals need an `l' > suffix: > > #define MY_LONG_PI 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751l > ^here > > Yeti > You can still use explicit cast, i.e. ((long double)G_PI) , can't you ? Even without the trail 'l' you have correctly suggested to add. Regards, Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
