--- David Neèas (Yeti) <yeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 05:44:44AM -0800, Sergei Steshenko wrote: > > > > Please reread the proposed clarification: > > > > * for gtk+2.8.20 there are no known to developers occurences of memory leaks; > > * gtk+2.10.* is effectively a developmnet release, so expect memory leaks and stay > > away from it for production code. > > That would not be a clarification, that would be serious > confusion at best. > > 387170 Fairly large leak in gtk+ > 360350 leak in gtk_radio_button_focus > 362439 gtkicontheme::pixbuf_supports_svg leaks GList > 370395 leak in gtk_rc_parse_icon_source > Fixed in current 2.10, not in 2.8.20. > So, should everyone distrust the claim that there are no memory leaks in 2.8.20 ? That is, it is fixed in current 2.10 because nobody wants to fix it in 2.8.20 or because there is no such leak in 2.8.20 ? If there are no leaks in 2.8.20, then my suggestion is correct - it's too early to declare 2.10.* to be leak-free. If the leak is also present in 2.8.20, then the leak-free statement is at all wrong. However much I am a coder I want common sense to be present - if you guys claim there are no leaks, there should be no leaks for at least a year. Where is the confusion in the proposed clarifications ? 1) does 2.8.20 have memory leaks ? 2) does 2.10.* have no reported memory leaks for a year or so ? --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
