--- David Neèas (Yeti) <yeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Read it `there are no known memory leaks in the current > version' instead of assuming the absence of memory leaks was > formally proved. The trust quetion is something everyone > has to answer for himself. > > Yeti > > > -- > Whatever. > _______________________________________________ If a suite is actively used and there were no bug reports regarding memory leaks for a year, then I'm ready to believe that for practical purposes the suite leak-free. If I see 9 memory leaks related bug fixes in one release, I won't beleive in the claim. Please reread the proposed clarification: * for gtk+2.8.20 there are no known to developers occurences of memory leaks; * gtk+2.10.* is effectively a developmnet release, so expect memory leaks and stay away from it for production code. and please pay attention to "no known to developers" and to "effectively a developmnet release" - I should have said "branch" instead of "release" - portions. I suggest to update the FAQ to avoid any misinterpretation. Regards, Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
