On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 00:24 -0800, Sergei Steshenko wrote: > > [really impressive list of bugs deleted]. > > As an end gtk+ user I just want to know which of the two > gtk+2.8.20 <-> 2.10.7 is less buggy. Indeed 2.10.7. The impressive list of bugs you saw has only been fixed in 2.10.7. Another set fixed in 2.10.6. Same for 2.10.5, ... None of them fixed in 2.8.x. This idea of thinking about newer series as buggier versions is fundamentally bogus. The way you should be thinking about 2.10 is 2.8 plus some new functionality plus lots of bug fixes. It typically is the case that if you don't use the new functionality, it's just added value, not many bugs introduced, etc. Gtk+ 2.6 vs 2.6 was of course different, because of moving to cairo. > And which of them has less memory leaks. Is Gtk+ known for being leaky? 2.10 has more fixes than 2.8, so for the same usage, it should be 2.10 that doesn't have more memory leaks. > Thanks, > Sergei. My 0.02 CAD -- behdad http://behdad.org/ "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
