Re: glib compile bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 18:57 +0200, David Necas (Yeti) wrote:
<snip>
> Yes, it is generated -- see the makefile.  Normally it uses
> ./glib-genmarshal, but for cross-compilation it tries to
> find it in PATH.  This makes sense as it cannot run the
> cross-compiled ./glib-genmarshal, but you have to give it
> some glib-genmarshal that grenerates an output the compiled
> version of GLib undestands.

[root@localhost glib-2.2.3-build]# cat Makefile  | grep marshal
GLIB_GENMARSHAL = /usr/bin/glib-genmarshal

[root@localhost glib-2.2.3-build]# /usr/bin/glib-genmarshal --version
glib-genmarshal version 2.6.4
glib-genmarshal comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You may redistribute copies of glib-genmarshal under the terms of
the GNU General Public License which can be found in the
GLib source package. Sources, examples and contact
information are available at http://www.gtk.org


Would glib-genmarshal (et al) binaries from a 2.2.3 solve all this?

_______________________________________________

gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

[Index of Archives]     [Touch Screen Library]     [GIMP Users]     [Gnome]     [KDE]     [Yosemite News]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux