On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 13:54 -0700, Banginwar, Rajesh wrote: > Hi, > Here some new questions that came up during LSB inclusion > process for all the Pango libraries: > > - All of libpangox-1.0 library is deprecated. LSB will not include this. > Is that Ok? Any comments? Please do not include it. It is basically non-functional at this time, and is included only to preserve ABI compat with apps that link to it but don't actually use it. > - Many of the interfaces in pango* libraries are ifdefed by > PANGO_ENABLE_ENGINE and PANGO_ENABLE_BACKEND macros. From what I could > find, these interfaces are low level and used rarely by the > applications. Should these be in LSB? Do applications require these > interfaces? Are they stable (any planned ABI changes)? These interfaces shouldn't be included in the LSB ... the #ifdef's reflect a reduced level of stability and indicate that the interfaces are not for application use: they are most of interest to someone writing an add-on script plugin, and such plugins aren't guaranteed to work between 1.8 and 1.10 or similar, only within a single 1.8.x series. Regards, Owen _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
