On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:07:14 BST, Robert Thorpe said: > If it isn't possible to write a program without Pango then that's a > disadvantage for my program. Since going though Pango means going > through more code it means possibly lower performance and possibly > problems from bugs in that code. Remember - it's the rare programmer indeed who has less bugs in their own code than bugs in well-tested subroutine libraries. You're just as likely to hit Pango bugs as X11 bugs, glibc bugs, kernel bugs, device driver bugs, and microcode bugs in the video card, BIOS bugs, and errata in the systems north/south/AGP bridges. In fact, in the last year, I've tripped over one or more of *each* of those categories of bugs - except Pango. ;)
Attachment:
pgpd82L6uxAbz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
