Douglas Vechinski writes: > While this might be a question for the Tcl list, why would the > iconv.dll's be different. Well, obviously the one bundled with ActiveTcl is older, and doesn't contain the libiconv_set_relocation_prefix entry point. (It is also possible that they are totally unrelated DLLs that just happen to have the same name, of course.) > If I swap the order in my path will the Tcl environment not like > using the GTK+ iconv.dll since it now would be in the path first. Is that a question or a statement? What happens if you try that? --tml _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
