On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 12:47 +0200, Matthias Kaeppler wrote: > Murray Cumming wrote: > > > You don't have to call foreach() on each row. But if you really want to > > examine each selection whenever the selection changes, what's the > > alternative? > > > > Hopefully you more often want to just know the first and last selected > > rows, or if anything is selected at all. Then you wouldn't have to call > > foreach() on them all. > > > > That's correct, but how can I achieve this? It would be enough for me to > only know the first and last row which is among the selection. Maybe > even only the last. get_selected_rows(). -- Murray Cumming murrayc@xxxxxxxxxxx www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
