> stian@xxxxxxxx wrote: > >>I'm not an expert but: >> >>Events that are queue'd are not scheduled until glib iterates again, so >>they will be "lost" yes. Even signals you emit by hand will be "lost" >>after the handler is unhooked. Atleast logic should be like that. >> >> > I may be a bit crazy but it can make sense to let all the events queued > for that handler to be processed before disconnecting it. > I know I could just force all the queued events to be processed before > disconnecting the handler, but it's not the right thing to do. Not really, since when you disconnect it, you might free the data user_data points to, so a new signal after that point would be unsecure. Else, when would you know that the user_data pointer will never be mentioned again. Stian _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
