Re: Why gtk+ application are so slow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:51:16 -0500, Paul Davis
><paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> i must be ultra modern, then. gedit fires up slightly faster than
>> kedit in all of 10 tests, including 5 done without flushing the buffer
>> cache and 5 where the buffer cache was flushed every time.
>
>Could you please tell us you hardware config?

P4, 2.8GHz, IDE 7200rpm drive, 2.4.26+lowlat kernel.

results are similar on a dual PII-400, all SCSI-3 10K drives, same
kernel.

my point was not to prove or disprove anything, merely to illustrate
that these anecdotal recountings of what is or isn't fast don't do
anything useful. they simply point out possible problems or benefits
of a particular machine+user configuration. whether the "runtime
design of GTK" has deep problems isn't covered by such "tests".

--p
_______________________________________________

gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

[Index of Archives]     [Touch Screen Library]     [GIMP Users]     [Gnome]     [KDE]     [Yosemite News]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux