On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 18:18 -0500, Antonio Monteiro wrote: > Allow me to expand on this, > this was one of the reasons I join the Gtk+ mailing lists. > > I started a binding for the D language > DUI - http://dui.sourceforge.net > and I have similar questions: > > 1. my logo is derived from the Gtk+ logo. Can I do that? We don't enforce a trademark on the GTK+ logo currently. But I'd personally prefer you didn't. I think it's just a little confusing/ Most (all?) of the other bindings of GTK+ for different languages don't reuse/modify the GTK+ logo. Also, permitting people to modify the logo would harm our case if we ever did want to apply for trademark protection. > 2. I'm inlining the html documentation into my D code. > Every thing should be fine because I'm releasing DUI under LGPL > but I'm planing to release it also under the zlib license. > again, can I do that? Really, you'd have to ask a lawyer to get a definitive answer. You can't change the license on the documentation, but distributing it under the current license(s) combined with a zlib-licensed library may be OK. (The license situation for the docs is frankly murky. See my previous mail.) > as Marc K. said, if this is not the right place to ask these > questions where should I ask them? This seems like a good place. gtk-list is a right place to ask general- interest questions about GTK+. Regards, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
