On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 15:00, Murray Cumming wrote: > Matthias wrote: > > What problem are you seeing ? > > I have it working now, > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtkmm/examples/book/treeview/combo_renderer/ > > and I really like it's simplicity compared to the hacky thing that I've > been using so far. > > However, I did notice: > > 1. It doesn't work at all unless you set the text_column property of the > renderer. I think that it should probably use the first text column that > it finds in the model, and it should warn if it doesn't find one. doesn't sound like a major win to me. > 2. I can't bind a GtkTreeModel* model column to the cell renderer's > "model" property, maybe because the base type is reported as > G_TYPE_INTERFACE instead of G_TYPE_OBJECT, in > _gtk_tree_data_list_value_to_node(). Maybe we could assuming that all > interfaces are gobjects? This is an interesting one. I guess gsignal may need some enhancement to support specifying parameters types by interfaces, then. > 3. There's no way to have a Combo cell renderer that has multiple columns, > such as the choice and a description of the choice. But I guess this would > require access to the whole GtkComboBox API. You can do that by connecting to the GtkCellRenderer::editing-started signal, which has full access to the editable, i.e. the combo box. Matthias _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
