Of course we can, I actually started this in order to gather as much feedback as possible, therefore if you have anything at all you're more then welcome to merge it. As a side not this document was a 20 minutes hack and might even contain some bugs, today I've looked it up more carefully and nailed a few in the Interface related questions. Anyway, I await your commits. I can add a public wiki for this, is it a good idea? On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 00:21, Ryan McDougall wrote: > On Wed, 2004-25-08 at 02:39 +0000, Tiago Cogumbreiro wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > I've just created a GObject FAQ where I try to answer, hopefully > > correctly, some questions I've had while programming with GObject. > > > > http://s1x.homelinux.net/documents/gtk/gobject-faq.html > > > > I would like to receive comments on bugs/typos it may contain as well as > > more entries if needed. Next thing I intend to do is to explain: > > - how interfaces should be implemented more throughly > > - properties > > - signals > > > > PS: That page also contains a simple guide on threaded programing which > > I've already brought to the list and some thoughts about Signals versus > > Listeners Interfaces. > > > > Thank you all for your time, > > > > Tiago Cogumbreiro > > > > Hi Tiago, > > I recently did a similar thing: writing down the answers to my own > questions as I learnt GObject. However there are some differences. My > text is really ugly, not like your site which is quite nice. My > perspective tries not just to state how GObject currently is, but to > also justify *why* it is that way -- in other words I try to ask myself > how would I do OO in C. > > So my question to you is can we collaborate? I think I have more text > than you currently, so I would like to merge your text with mine, then > mark the result up and post it on your site with credits to both of us. > > What do you think? > > Cheers, > Ryan _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
