On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 06:41, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > > If gdk_thread_init() would call g_thread_init() you couldn't use GTK+ > > with another library or any code that needs to call g_thread_init() > > before gtk_init(). Doesn't sound like a good idea to me. > > That's misleading: gdk_thread_init would call g_thread_init if not already done > (it already checks whether g_thread_init has been called), so that doesn't > prevent you from calling g_thread_init before hand, possibly with > different arguments. > > As for not being able to use GTK+ with another library that's not a valid > argument: Gdk depends on glib already for many things, so the dependency > is there, and can't be removed. > > Now, I'm sure there must be *some* valid reason for not doing the obvious, > but I don't see what this reason would be (and don't see it documented > as part of e.g. gdk_threads_init). Well, one thing is the vtable that g_thread_init() uses. But I think the main reason I did it the way I did it was the idea that g_thread_init() should be the very first thing an app calls in its main() function. Regards, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
