On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 11:30, Roger Leigh wrote: > "gregt" <gregt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I never solved it and gave up. > [...] > > From what I have seen there are many developers that have the same > > problem in compiling glib/gtk+ with Cygwin. It does'nt work out of the box and > > the dependencies are not worked out and not documented. > > I persevered, and I've now successfully built: > > GLib (2.2.3) > Atk (1.2.4) > Pango (1.2.5) > Gtk+ (2.2.4) > libglade (2.0.1) > SigC++ (1.2.5) > Gtkmm (2.2.9) > libglademm (2.1.3) > > I'll have the patches cleaned up in a few days, and I can post them > then. I'll also redo them for GTK+ 2.4 and file bugs in bugzilla. Is > it worth filing bugs against 2.2.x, or is it now effectively dead? > i.e. will there be any further 2.2.x releases? There will be no further 2.2.x releases. Regards, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
