Re: compiling glib with cygwin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 11:30, Roger Leigh wrote:
> "gregt" <gregt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > I never solved it and gave up.
> [...]
> > From what I have seen there are many developers that have the same
> > problem in compiling glib/gtk+ with Cygwin. It does'nt work out of the box and
> > the dependencies are not worked out and not documented.
> 
> I persevered, and I've now successfully built:
> 
> GLib       (2.2.3)
> Atk        (1.2.4)
> Pango      (1.2.5)
> Gtk+       (2.2.4)
> libglade   (2.0.1)
> SigC++     (1.2.5)
> Gtkmm      (2.2.9)
> libglademm (2.1.3)
> 
> I'll have the patches cleaned up in a few days, and I can post them
> then.  I'll also redo them for GTK+ 2.4 and file bugs in bugzilla.  Is
> it worth filing bugs against 2.2.x, or is it now effectively dead?
> i.e. will there be any further 2.2.x releases?

There will be no further 2.2.x releases.

Regards,
							Owen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Touch Screen Library]     [GIMP Users]     [Gnome]     [KDE]     [Yosemite News]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux