On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Owen Taylor wrote: [..] > Looks like we're missing a requirement on glib-2.3.3, upgrade and make > sure GTK+ is finding it and you should be fine. (G_DEFINE_TYPE changed > slightly between 2.3.2 and 2.3.3) Yes. This was compiled on glib 2.3.2. Why (the hel) gtk+ autoconf script have incorrect checking enviromet ? ;) <disclaimer>I have RW access</dislaimer> Is it not will be good commit to gtk+ ? Index: configure.in =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gtk+/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.361 diff -u -r1.361 configure.in --- configure.in 25 Feb 2004 00:43:21 -0000 1.361 +++ configure.in 25 Feb 2004 16:33:40 -0000 @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ m4_define([gtk_binary_version], [2.2.0]) # required versions of other packages -m4_define([glib_required_version], [2.3.2]) +m4_define([glib_required_version], [2.3.3]) m4_define([pango_required_version], [1.2.0]) m4_define([atk_required_version], [1.0.1]) or even better (because this is not first time) Index: configure.in =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gtk+/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.361 diff -u -r1.361 configure.in --- configure.in 25 Feb 2004 00:43:21 -0000 1.361 +++ configure.in 25 Feb 2004 16:35:54 -0000 @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ m4_define([gtk_binary_version], [2.2.0]) # required versions of other packages -m4_define([glib_required_version], [2.3.2]) +m4_define([glib_required_version],[$gtk_major_version.$gtk_minor_version.$gtk_micro_version]) m4_define([pango_required_version], [1.2.0]) m4_define([atk_required_version], [1.0.1]) kloczek -- ----------------------------------------------------------- *Ludzie nie maj± problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzaj±* ----------------------------------------------------------- Tomasz K³oczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: kloczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx* _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
