>> >GTK+ is intended to be its replacement, but is there a resource >> >that describes the (dis)advantages of using GTK vs. tried and >> >tested Motif. >> >> i can't point you to such a resource, but i would suggest that you >> consider listing the number of applications written with GTK+ versus >> those with Motif. i suspect that the former number in the hundreds, >> while the latter (publicly known, anyway) in the tens. "tried and >> tested" - i think not. > >My point exactly. I was trying to say that Motif is the "tried and >tested" GUI toolkit of choice, which is why I need to make my >GTK argument. that's the opposite of my point. there are lots *more* GTK apps than Motif apps, at least those that are publicly available. Motif has not been used for anything like the range of apps that GTK has. --p _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
