> From: Tara Milana [mailto:learfox@xxxxxxx] > On 2003.10.16 01:43 Murray.Cumming@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Tara Milana [mailto:learfox@xxxxxxx] > > > What if, for example, if a packaged GTK+ 2 was compiled for, > > > say, a glibc 2.2 system and someone with a glibc 2.0 system > > > could still run GTK+ 2 if it were compiled for glibc 2.0 but > > > the packaged GTK+ 2 was not compiled for glibc 2.0. In this > > > case the person would need to compile from source. > > > > Is that likely? For instance, I don't think that debian or RedHat's > > GTK+ would suddenly need glibc 2.2 instead of glibc 2.0 > between GTK+ > > 2.2.20 and > > GTK+ 2.2.21. I have no idea what version of glibc is used by any > > particular > > version of GTK+ on RedHat or Debian in reality. > > Hi, yes it is likely. Can you give me some more information? Is it likely on debian or Redhat, for instance? When/where have you seen such a problem? Murray Cumming www.murrayc.com murrayc@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
