Hi, Chad A Daelhousen <cd9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Oh, I misunderstood the problem. /usr/bin/pkg-config is _still there_, > oblivious to /usr/local/*, and run by default because it's earlier in > $PATH. > > In that case, is there any situation in which /usr/bin/pkg-config should > NOT look in /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig? Havoc, as maintainer, what are > your thoughts? Should this be changed? Yes, pkg-config should never look into any other prefix than the one it was installed to. Unless of course you tell it so by setting your PKG_CONFIG_PATH. Please check the xdg-list archives. This has been discussed there in full length (the thread starts with https://listman.redhat.com/archives/xdg-list/2003-September/msg00106.html). Sven _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list