On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 16:20, iain wrote: > On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 13:16, Dave Malcolm wrote: > > > > > Some questions: > > > > (i) what stable release of GTK (if any) would I have to add as a > > > > dependency if I wanted to link to this functionality in GTK+? > > > > > > I'm using it my application and linking it to gtk2.2, but I think it > > > should work with 2.0 > > > > It doesn't seem to be present on my vanilla Red Hat 9 machine, on which > > "pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0" gives "2.2.1". Specifically, I can't > > find the header file <gtk/gtkaction.h> (which was put in the CVS version > > of GTK from libegg on 24th August 2003). This file also doesn't seem to > > be present in the 2.2.4 tarball, which I believe is the most recent > > stable release. > > > > What header files are you using, and what modversion do you get? > > > > Oh, I misunderstood your question. > I thought you were asking what version of gtk did the code in libegg > depend on. > The gtkaction stuff is going to be in gtk 2.4, the code in libegg should > work with gtk > 2.0 I think. Aha - thanks! That makes much more sense. > > > > > Thats exactly how its supposed to work. > > > Note that when you change to use the GTK 2.4 version that > > > there are some differences between the libegg version and the > > > gtk version. > > > > Thanks for the warning. Hopefully they are minor at the moment. > > Some renaming of functions and a few changes to the structures. > > iain -- David Malcolm www.conglomerate.org _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
