On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 22:34:33 -0700 Ken Deeter <ktdeeter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - it has to be made clear to a person using a im context that they > need to override this added method. An ideal solution should not > require a creator of a widget that uses an IM context to have to > implement a separate method so that the IM will get keystrokes, it > should happen automatically I think your opinion is right. I'm noticed adding new method doesn't seem good to solve this problem. > I think the spirit of the original snooper patch is more appropriate. > The IMContext should be modified so that when it is or becomes active, > it tells someone "i need keystrokes", and the keystroke handling > mechanism should be modified so that when it knows a particular > context needs keystrokes, they will get there. I think spirit of original snooper patch is not enough. Because now we are disscussing about IM key event handling, but Gtk+ has another key event handling problem. Another problem is discussed in the last few days on gtk-devel-list. I think gtk+ should have something new keystroke handling mechanism. (So, our conclusion may be same.) Regard, TOKUNAGA Hiroyuki _______________________________________________ gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
