Re: Is GTK+ mature on all platforms?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 06:57, Michael Torrie wrote:

> GTK for win32 is now only slightly behind GTK/X11 in terms of stability
> and functionality.  It's really getting quite good.  The glib wrapper
> functions really make differences in platforms quite neglible,
> eliminating most of my #ifdefs.  Things like process control and file
> handling, for example, are quite well done.  I understand that QT has
> much more to offer in the way of a framework, but I think it's often too
> much.  GTK strikes a good balance.  (Does anyone know how to ask GTK+
> for the operating system directory separatoer character?)

Its defined as G_DIR_SEPARATOR (a character).

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl@xxxxxxxxxx    alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
He's an immortal native American cop haunted by memories of 'Nam. She's a 
supernatural wisecracking archaeologist fleeing from a Satanic cult. They 
fight crime! 

_______________________________________________

gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

[Index of Archives]     [Touch Screen Library]     [GIMP Users]     [Gnome]     [KDE]     [Yosemite News]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux