Hello, On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 09:49:24PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:38:36PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 at 11:41, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > This set will switch the users of pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() to > > > __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() while the former will soon be re-purposed > > > to include a call to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). The two are almost > > > always used together, apart from bugs which are likely common. Going > > > forward, most new users should be using pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(). > > > > > > Once this conversion is done and pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() re-purposed, > > > I'll post another set to merge the calls to __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() > > > and pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). > > > > That sounds like it could cause a lot of churns. > > > > Why not add a new helper function that does the > > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() and the pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() > > things? Then we can start moving users over to this new interface, > > rather than having this intermediate step? > > I think the API would be nicer if we used the shortest and simplest > function names for the most common use cases. Following > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() with pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() is that > most common use case. That's why I like Sakari's approach of repurposing > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), and introducing > __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() for the odd cases where > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() shouldn't be called. That's ok for me. However this patch series isn't the optimal path to there because most drivers (i.e. those that already today do pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() in combination with pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()) have to be patched twice. The saner route is: Only convert the drivers with a sole pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() (i.e. without pm_runtime_mark_last_busy()) to __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(). Then add the mark_last_busy() bits to pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() and then drop the explicit calls to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() before pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(). (Note this doesn't take into account Rafael's position that pm_runtime_put() might be the saner option. My argument applies for that conversion analogously.) Best regards Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list -- greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to greybus-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|