Hello Alex,
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 09:08:15AM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 1/25/24 6:10 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > + chip = devm_pwmchip_alloc(&gbphy_dev->dev, response.count, sizeof(*pwmc));
> > + if (IS_ERR(chip)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(chip);
> > + goto exit_connection_destroy;
> > }
> > + pwmc = pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(chip);
> > pwmc->connection = connection;
> > +
> > gb_connection_set_data(connection, pwmc);
> > - gb_gbphy_set_data(gbphy_dev, pwmc);
> > + gb_gbphy_set_data(gbphy_dev, chip);
>
> I'm pretty sure driver data should still be the Greybus
> structure, otherwise you're really changing the way this
> works (most likely in a way that's different from other
> Greybus drivers.
The problem is that you cannot easily get the chip from pwmc unless you
add a pointer to struct gb_pwm_chip.
Regarding your other feedback: You're right, this patch is more
intrusive than it should be. I wonder what went wrong. I'll do some
research and rework accordingly. Probably I squashed some things
together that should be separate patches.
thanks for your feedback
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list -- greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to greybus-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|