On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:32:47AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 1/25/24 04:08, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Currently a pwm_chip stores in its struct device *dev member a pointer
> > to the parent device. Preparing a change that embeds a full struct
> > device in struct pwm_chip, this accessor macro should be used in all
> > drivers directly accessing chip->dev now. This way struct pwm_chip and
> > this macro can be changed without having to touch all drivers in the
> > same change set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Nit: this is not a macro but an inline function.
Oh right, it used to be a macro, but I changed that. I made the commit
log read:
pwm: Provide an inline function to get the parent device of a given chip
Currently a pwm_chip stores in its struct device *dev member a pointer
to the parent device. Preparing a change that embeds a full struct
device in struct pwm_chip, this accessor function should be used in all
drivers directly accessing chip->dev now. This way struct pwm_chip and
this new function can be changed without having to touch all drivers in
the same change set.
Thanks,
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list -- greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to greybus-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|