Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Manage owner assignment implicitly for drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 5:28 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
> of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
> owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
> usually lives in read-only memory and so cannot be modified.
> The upside is that new lowlevel drivers cannot forget the assignment and

low level

> save one line each. The pwm-crc driver didn't assign .owner, that's not
> a problem in practise though as the driver cannot be compiled as a
> module.


>  drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c                |  1 -

Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> # Intel LPSS

With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
greybus-dev mailing list -- greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to greybus-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk App Development]     [PJ SIP]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [IETF Sipping]     [Info Cyrus]     [ALSA User]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Asterisk Books]

  Powered by Linux