On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 07:51:50AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2023, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 09:55:45AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 01:31:10AM -0700, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> > > > Convert 'pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip' from a macro to a static
> > > > inline function, to make the relevant types apparent in the
> > > > definition and to benefit from the type checking performed by
> > > > the compiler at call sites.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c | 6 ++++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> > > > index 3fda172239d2..88da1d796f13 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> > > > @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ struct gb_pwm_chip {
> > > > struct pwm_chip chip;
> > > > struct pwm_chip *pwm;
> > > > };
> > > > -#define pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(chip) \
> > > > - container_of(chip, struct gb_pwm_chip, chip)
> > > >
> > > > +static inline struct gb_pwm_chip *pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return container_of(chip, struct gb_pwm_chip, chip);
> > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > static int gb_pwm_count_operation(struct gb_pwm_chip *pwmc)
> > > > {
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > This patch didn't apply due to changes made in my tree by a patch from
> > > someone else before yours. Can you rebase it and resend?
> > >
> >
> > Hi greg,
> >
> > I am confused, will that be a totally new patch or a new version(v4 in
> > this case)?
>
> New version.
>
Thank you julia.
Regards
Sumitra
> julia
>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sumitra
> >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
greybus-dev mailing list -- greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to greybus-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|