On ١٩/٣/٢٠٢٣ ١٨:٠٩, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
On domenica 19 marzo 2023 16:29:09 CET Menna Mahmoud wrote: > Remove unnecessary blank line before struct as reported > by checkpatch: > > " CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines " > > Signed-off-by: Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c> index 3fda172239d2..26d39e08c3b6 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ struct gb_pwm_chip { > #define pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(chip) \ > container_of(chip, struct gb_pwm_chip, chip) > > - > static int gb_pwm_count_operation(struct gb_pwm_chip *pwmc) > { > struct gb_pwm_count_response response; > -- > 2.34.1 Hi Menna,
Hi Fabio,
I just saw that today you sent this patch at least three times: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319114155.42148-2-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@xxxxxxxxx/
This for different file, and the below I sent it with other patch so I resend it again.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319152909.163598-1-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@xxxxxxxxx/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319132452.151877-2-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@xxxxxxxxx/ Why are you doing so?
sorry for this.
Please send your patches only once and wait at least a week without any replies before resending. Furthermore, when resending, please explain under the three dashes ("---") why you are doing so. Patches may get lost, but this is not your case for sending them again and again in a single day.
got your point.
Is there anything I'm missing? Thanks, Fabio
Thanks, Menna _______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list -- greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to greybus-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|