Re: [PATCH v4] staging: greybus: Convert uart.c from IDR to XArray
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx>, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] staging: greybus: Convert uart.c from IDR to XArray
- From: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 07:09:16 -0500
- In-reply-to: <6155058.TBsaUTXu4T@localhost.localdomain>
- References: <20210829092250.25379-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> <f7a25eb1-20f4-5031-a156-9e5dc019ad28@linaro.org> <YS3jSsGSs0yAw/Ba@hovoldconsulting.com> <6155058.TBsaUTXu4T@localhost.localdomain>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
On 8/31/21 6:50 AM, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> I was wrong in assuming that trivial patches to Greybus are welcome as they
> are for other drivers.
This is not a correct statement.
But as Johan pointed out, even for a trivial patch if you
must understand the consequences of what the change does.
If testing is not possible, you must work extra hard to
ensure your patch is correct.
In the first (or an early) version of your patch I pointed
out a bug. Later, I suggested
the lock might not be necessary
and asked you to either confirm
it was or explain why it was
not, but you didn't do that.
I agree that the change appeared trivial, and even sensible,
but even trivial patches must result in correct code. And
all patches should have good and complete explanations.
-Alex
_______________________________________________
greybus-dev mailing list
greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev
[Index of Archives]
[Asterisk App Development]
[PJ SIP]
[Gnu Gatekeeper]
[IETF Sipping]
[Info Cyrus]
[ALSA User]
[Fedora Linux Users]
[Linux SCTP]
[DCCP]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[Deep Creek Hot Springs]
[Yosemite Campsites]
[ISDN Cause Codes]
[Asterisk Books]