On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:29:59PM +0800, tiantao (H) wrote: > > 在 2021/4/7 16:22, Greg KH 写道: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Tian Tao wrote: > > > disable_irq() after request_irq() still has a time gap in which > > > interrupts can come. request_irq() with IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag will > > > disable IRQ auto-enable because of requesting. > > > > > > this patch is made base on "add IRQF_NO_AUTOEN for request_irq" which > > > is being merged: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1388765/ > > Can you wait until that is merged before sending this out to us as we > > can't do anything until then. > > this is already in linux-next.git. > > cbe16f3 genirq: Add IRQF_NO_AUTOEN for request_irq/nmi() That's great, but note that linux-next is a combined tree of all subsystem trees. It's impossible for a subsystem tree to include linux-next :) So how about we wait until this gets into Linus's tree so that we do not all suddenly get problems in our individual subsystem trees. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev