Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: greybus: Fixed alignment issue in hid.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:51:30PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12-02-21, 10:17, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:39:26PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 12-02-21, 13:48, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
> > > > This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should match
> > > > open parenthesis".
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <pritthijit.nath@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c | 4 ++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c
> > > > index ed706f39e87a..a56c3fb5d35a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c
> > > > @@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ static void gb_hid_init_reports(struct gb_hid *ghid)
> > > >  }
> > > > 
> > > >  static int __gb_hid_get_raw_report(struct hid_device *hid,
> > > > -		unsigned char report_number, __u8 *buf, size_t count,
> > > > -		unsigned char report_type)
> > > > +				   unsigned char report_number, __u8 *buf, size_t count,
> > > > +				   unsigned char report_type)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct gb_hid *ghid = hid->driver_data;
> > > >  	int ret;
> > > 
> > > I can't even count the number of attempts we have seen in previous
> > > years to make checkpatch --strict happy for greybus.
> > > 
> > > I say we make this change once and for all across greybus, so we don't
> > > have to review or NAK someone afterwards.
> > > 
> > > Should I send a patch for this ?
> > 
> > Sure, but note that over time, checkpatch adds new things so there will
> > always be something to change in here, until we move it out of the
> > drivers/staging/ area :)
> 
> Right, though I wasn't worried about other checkpatch warning but
> specially the "alignment - parenthesis" one. Everyone (specially
> newbies) want to fix that everywhere :)

But what will the checkpatch crew then work on? Better staging than the
rest of the kernel.

Perhaps just let them keep at it until we move the rest out (the price
we pay for taking this through staging apparently).

But there can't be that many instances left of this alignment
"violation" in staging/greybus (~4 it seems) if you want to get it over
with.

Johan
_______________________________________________
greybus-dev mailing list
greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev




[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk App Development]     [PJ SIP]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [IETF Sipping]     [Info Cyrus]     [ALSA User]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Asterisk Books]

  Powered by Linux