On 25/01/20 11:00 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 02:14:03PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:fix uninitialized variables issue found using static code analysis toolWhich tool is that?(error) Uninitialized variable: offset (error) Uninitialized variable: size Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c index a8efb86..9eabeb3 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int gb_bootrom_get_firmware(struct gb_operation *op) struct gb_bootrom_get_firmware_request *firmware_request; struct gb_bootrom_get_firmware_response *firmware_response; struct device *dev = &op->connection->bundle->dev; - unsigned int offset, size; + unsigned int offset = 0, size = 0; enum next_request_type next_request; int ret = 0;I think this has come up in the past, and while the code in question is overly complicated and confuses static checkers as well as humans, it looks correct to me. Please make sure to verify the output of any tools before posting patches based on them. Johan
I used cppcheck tool . _______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev
|