On Thu, Feb 16, 2017, at 03:03 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Tobin, > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Tobin C. Harding <me@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Greybus currently uses strncpy() coupled with a check for '\0' on the > > last byte of various buffers. strncpy() is passed size parameter equal > > to the size of the buffer in all instances. If the source string is > > larger than the destination buffer the check catches this and, after > > logging the error, returns an error value. In one instance the > > immediate return is not required. Using strncpy() with the manual check > > adds code that could be removed by the use of strlcpy(), although truncation > > then needs to be checked. > > > > Replace calls to strncpy() with calls to strlcpy(). Replace null > > termination checks with checks for truncated string. Add log message > > if string is truncated but do not return an error code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c | 59 +++++++++++---------------------- > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c > > index 3cd6cf0..1cd5a45 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c > > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static int fw_mgmt_interface_fw_version_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt, > > struct gb_connection *connection = fw_mgmt->connection; > > struct gb_fw_mgmt_interface_fw_version_response response; > > int ret; > > + size_t len; > > > > ret = gb_operation_sync(connection, > > GB_FW_MGMT_TYPE_INTERFACE_FW_VERSION, NULL, 0, > > @@ -121,18 +122,11 @@ static int fw_mgmt_interface_fw_version_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt, > > fw_info->major = le16_to_cpu(response.major); > > fw_info->minor = le16_to_cpu(response.minor); > > > > - strncpy(fw_info->firmware_tag, response.firmware_tag, > > + len = strlcpy(fw_info->firmware_tag, response.firmware_tag, > > GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE); > > - > > - /* > > - * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error but > > - * don't fail. > > - */ > > - if (fw_info->firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] != '\0') { > > + if (len >= GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE) > > I am not sure if the new code you have written is any better than what > was already there. > We still have a strcpy variant followed by a check. What has improved ? > > > > @@ -142,6 +136,7 @@ static int fw_mgmt_load_and_validate_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt, > > { > > struct gb_fw_mgmt_load_and_validate_fw_request request; > > int ret; > > + size_t len; > > > > if (load_method != GB_FW_LOAD_METHOD_UNIPRO && > > load_method != GB_FW_LOAD_METHOD_INTERNAL) { > > @@ -151,16 +146,10 @@ static int fw_mgmt_load_and_validate_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt, > > } > > > > request.load_method = load_method; > > - strncpy(request.firmware_tag, tag, GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE); > > - > > - /* > > - * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error and > > - * fail. > > - */ > > - if (request.firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] != '\0') { > > - dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent, "load-and-validate: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n"); > > - return -EINVAL; > > Sorry but the error returns here and at other places were very > intentional. I > wrote them to make sure the protocol is followed properly, and the other > side doesn't break it. > > So far its a NAK from me. > > -- > viresh thanks for taking the time to review Viresh. I'll drop this patch. thanks, Tobin. _______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev