On 01/05/2017 12:25 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 05/01/17 17:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> While the timesync protocol was a great idea, it never ended up getting >> implemented by any known hardware devices. It's also a bit >> "interesting" in how it ties into the platform controller. >> >> So, just remove it for now. It's not needed, no one uses it, and it's a >> stumbling block in getting the greybus core code merged out of the >> staging tree. If anyone wants it in the future, reverting this patch is >> a great place to start from. >> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Sorry Bryan, I know it was a lot of work, and it's a great protocol and >> implementation, but it never made it into a device :( > > Kill it. > > One less turd to polish. I think the core algorithm has some value that we might use at some future date. But I concur, at this point it interferes with things getting reorganized cleanly. -Alex > > Acked-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > _______________________________________________ greybus-dev mailing list greybus-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev
|