* Nico Schottelius <nico-gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey Enrico, > > Enrico Weigelt [Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 06:19:01AM +0200]: > > here're a lot of fixes against the latest gpm-2-dev branch > > (because it didnt want to compile ;-o): > > > > git://git.metux.de/gpm.git -> METUX.gpm-2-dev-cleanup > > Looks good besides 9b76c2f2674d290508791d56629aaf8b63aac051 > (defining _GNU_SOURCE). I'll merge it anyway, but keep in mind hmm, anyone have better idea ? The problem is: glibc only defines struct ucred w/ _GNU_SOURCE set. No other (probably more portable) symbol. I really wonder why the inventors of this stuff didn't simply put it in its own header file. Probably too trivial for being considered ;-o cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ gpm mailing list gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm