Re: Question about commit e8ea3d3...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Frysinger [Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:04:59PM -0400]:
> On Sunday 20 April 2008, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> > Added become_daemon() from gpm2 to gpm1.
> >
> > This is a bit ugly, as it implies some relative symlinks, but it works
> > for the translation to gpm2.
> 
> so gpm as a maintenance branch will stay linux-only, but gpm2 will be 
> targetting POSIX ?  sounds fine to me, just want to make sure i understand 
> things :

Mostly correct, although I'll prefer patches that are posix compliant in
all trees, so I can reuse patches for 1.20.x for 1.99.x.

I know that there will be os-dependent code in gpm2, too, but this
should only be in os-specific drivers (mouse/console).

Nico


-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
gpm mailing list
gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]