* Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > different source trees: > -> bitrot > -> wasted development time I don't think so. Its just like any other application importing some library. I don't intend to leave any code duplication. One of my intentions is to get a clear front line between server and client. If we leave the current sourcetree and just add some configure options, on building against an external libgpm the includes get mixed up. This may or may not cause problems, but for me its an too much uncertainty, I don't like to cope with (as a package/system maintainer). Well, I'll supply some patches against the monolithic tree, ie. for creating an libgpm.pc file, selecting compontents to build (as you suggested), in a few days. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ gpm mailing list gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm