* Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ah, the list seems to be up again. great :) > > I've just released my first version of an standalone libgpm. > > i dont get it, you arent the gpm maintainer No, I'm not. But I'm currently maintaining my libgpm fork. Of course would be great, if you'd accept it. > > The library provides an pkgconfig descriptor (libgpm.pc), so > > its very easy to import it into other packages. > > why dont you post a patch against the current git repo ? Would be quite large, since I removed many files, which aren't used for libgpm. I'm currently working on gpm without included libgpm, but built against an external one. My further plan is: + more tests on libgpm and patch some apps (ie. mc) to build against it (-> use pkg-config) + port the gpm server to it and remove the included libgpm + merge in newer patches + create an container with both, so people can build/install it as they used to. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ gpm mailing list gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm