> I'm not subscribed to the mailing list; please cc any replies to me. This means the message went in moderation, with hundreds of spam messages. Today I discarded all of them and couldn't approve your (I've seen it in the list of subjects pending for approval, though, but that list is so big and bad that it went to the spam folder as well). > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:45:25 -0400 > From: Matt <matt@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Patch to implement "gpm -V" > Message-ID: <20050830114525.A30353@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > http://matt.ioioio.net/gpm-1.20.1-matt.patch > (~3 KB) > > This patch attempts to implement "gpm -V", as part of a small effort to > make gpm work under D. J. Bernstein's daemontools package > (http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html). > > Judging by the usage info (man 8 gpm), the verbosity level should be one > of the values used by syslog, where 0 is the most important and 7 is the > least important. But gpm has fewer internal levels of verbosity, and > the values are in the opposite order: 2 is the least important and 6 is > the most important. This patch follows gpm's internal conventions; the > semantics are a bit strange, but it mostly does what the user expects. > > I'm not subscribed to the mailing list; please cc any replies to me. _______________________________________________ gpm mailing list gpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/gpm