Re: GNUGK vs. H323Plus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marek

 

In general all features are negotiated between the parties. H.460.26 is no different. H.460.26 is advertised in the RRQ from h323plus and the reply is in the RCF.  H.460.26 will only advertise IF H.460.17 is used. This will allow ALL signaling and media to be carried over one port.

 

Simon

 

From: Marek Podgorny [mailto:marek.podgorny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 5:14 PM
To: GNU Gatekeeper Users
Subject: GNUGK vs. H323Plus

 

Is there a mechanism in place to coordinate support of new protocols  - like recently adddc H.460.26 - between GNUGK and H323Plus library?

 

Marek Podgorny
CollabWorx

marek.podgorny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (eMail, SIP, Jabber, GTalk, video)

+1 315 373-6345

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most 
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux