Hi, proxy mode is not enough to get media through firewalls unless GnuGk sits directly _on_ the firewall. You need to turn on H.460.18. [RoutedMode] EnableH46018=1 Regards, Jan -- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/ Ashwani Kumar wrote: > Thanks jan H323 signaling is works in this scenario, but not getting media > on any sides. > > *H323 client 1 (192.168.120.196) <---->(Router public > IP=203.187.yyy.xx)<------->( IP world )<-----> GateKeeper (public > ip=124.30.y.xx)* <-------->H323 client 2 (192.168.7.63) > * > I have configured gnugk in *Case III* (Proxy) mode as described in the > link: http://www.gnugk.org/gnugk-manual-5.html#proxy > > and below is the details: > > [Proxy] > Enable=1 > ;InternalNetwork=10.0.1.0/255.255.255.0,127.0.0.0/8 > ;T120PortRange=40000-40999 > RTPPortRange=7000-59999 > ProxyForNAT=1 > ProxyForSameNAT=1 > EnableRTPMute=1 > EnableRTCPStatus=1 > > below is the gnugk log messages > > 2012/09/21 12:11:20.499 3 ProxyChannel.cxx(7278) RTP > 203.187.yyy.xx:7001<=>124.30.y.xx:7002<=>192.168.7.63:60216 Error(0): > Input/output error (12:111) > 2012/09/21 12:11:20.499 3 ProxyChannel.cxx(7278) RTP > 203.187.yyy.xx:7001<=>124.30.y.xx:7002<=>192.168.7.63:60216 Error(0): > Input/output error (12:111) > 2012/09/21 12:11:20.499 3 ProxyChannel.cxx(7278) RTP > 203.187.yyy.xx:7001<=>124.30.y.xx:7002<=>192.168.7.63:60216 Error(0): > Input/output error (12:111) > 2012/09/21 12:11:20.515 3 ProxyChannel.cxx(7278) RTP > 203.187.yyy.xx:7001<=>124.30.y.xx:7002<=>192.168.7.63:60216 Error(0): > Input/output error (12:111) > > does any other configuration require gatekeeper side? > > > > Thanks in Advance > Ashwani > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jan Willamowius <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:33 PM > Subject: Re: Reg. H323 GNU GK with lifesize > To: Ashwani Kumar <ash1412@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Hi, > > just turn on H.460.18 in GnuGka and this scenario should work. > > BTW: This is the kind of question for the GnuGk users mailinglist. > > Regards, > Jan > > Ashwani Kumar wrote: > > Thanks jan, Its works. > > > > I would like to use H323 NAT feature. I read on Internet, that H323 > > Gatekeeper can be use as H323 nat traversal. > > > > I tried to use below scenario but no success. > > > > *H323 client 1 (192.168.120.100)* <---->*(Router public > > IP=203.187.yyy.xx)<------->( IP world )<-----> **GateKeeper (public > > ip=124.30.y.xx)* <-------->*H323 client 2 (192.168.7.63) GK registration > > successful > > > > *-- here H323 client 1 & 2 are simph323 applications*. > > > > *-- from H323 client 1 to Gatekeeper (public IP 124.30.y.xx) receiving > the > > registration messages but H323 client 1 getting registration > > failed error.* > > > > *-- does my scenario correct? if not can you please suggest simple > scenario > > to test H323 NAT?* > > > > *-- does Any changes required in simpH323 application to enable NAT? When > > I run this application able to see simpH323 > > application supports below NAT features:* > > *Available NAT Methods: > > STUN > > GnuGk > > H46024 > > H46019 > > * > > > > > > *Thanks In Advance > > Ashwani Kumar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
