Hi David, I don't think it will work well: You can use the SendTo= switch to tell GnuGk to forward RRQs, but the registration lists can get out of sync easily and the call information would still be only inside of one gatekeepers memory. The better approach would probably be to let GnuGk store registrations and call states in a database that could be accessed by multiple gatekeepers. I've been thinking about that feature for quite a while now, but so far its not implemented. Regards, Jan David Vrtin wrote: > Hi all > > Does it make any sense to put F5 in front of GNU gatekeeper and have 2 > gatekeepers > in "background", if such gatekeeper is used only for call-routing and > for registrations of > endpoints (and MCUs) ? > > In such configuration, both gatekeepers need to share "endpoint > registration tables". Is > this supported in GNU GK? > > Best regards, > David -- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
