Re: gk behind NAT

["Simon Horne" <s.horne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Piyush

 

The ports to forward for call signalling is TCP 1720 not 1730.

Make sure your INI port ranges reflex the port forwards.

 

Port Forwards

UDP  1719                RAS

TCP  1720                Q931 (Incoming call)

TCP  30000 - 32000   H245 & Q931

UDP  50000 - 60000   RTP/RTSP

 

INI entries

[Gatekeeper::Main]

Fortytwo=42

ExternalIP=x.x.x.x

 

[RoutedMode]

CallSignalPort=1720

Q931PortRange=30000-30999

H245PortRange=31000-31999

 

[Proxy]

Enable=1

RTPPortRange=50000-59999

 

 

Simon

 

 

From: Piyush Verma [mailto:piyush.pv@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 25 June 2011 23:33
To: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: gk behind NAT

 

Dear All,

I have spent ed 1.5 day's to configure gnugk without success.

I have installed gnugk on a server behind NAT.

I have forwarded 1 to 1730 and 30000 to 60000 to the server.

I am able to connect ssh which ensure that port forwarding is working properly.


I am able to connect to GK from local ip like 192.168.1.35.

But I am unable to connect to same GK using public ip.


I have using NAT.ini and gatekeeper.ini  and updated public IP.


Any idea what step I am missing ?


--
Thanks & Regards

Piyush Verma

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2

_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/