Robert Huh I'm a little confused? You set the gatekeepers up as neighbors. See here. http://openh323gk.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openh323gk/openh323gk/etc/neigh bor.ini?revision=1.9&view=markup Simon -----Original Message----- From: Robert Kulagowski [mailto:rkulagow@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: 11 March 2011 01:26 To: GNU Gatekeeper Users Subject: Re: [Spam] Re: GK Routed vs. Proxy mode On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Denis Kochmashev "Enforta" <d.kochmashev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Robert. > > Simon is right. As a quick solutiuon I would suggest to try the > following settings on the _other_ GK: > > [RasSrv::ARQFeatures] > ArjReasonRouteCallToGatekeeper=0 > > But this will make your network slightly uncontrollable cause _other_ > GK will allow direct calls between endpoints. Please keep it in mind > :) OK, I've tried to do the following on GK2 as per Simon's suggestion: [Routing::Explicit] ; cfo-ta 149.7.37.47=13122455120 I've also tried ; cfo-ta 149.7.37.47=cfo-ta (the endpoint is registered to GK1 as h323 name "cfo-ta" and "13122455120".) Neither of them seem to trigger the neighbor part of my routing policy. 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 2 singleton.cxx(27) Create instance: PreliminaryCallTable(9) 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 5 Routing.cxx(196) ROUTING Checking policy Explicit for request Setup CRV=7808 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 5 Routing.cxx(196) ROUTING Checking policy Internal for request Setup CRV=7808 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 5 Routing.cxx(196) ROUTING Checking policy Neighbor for request Setup CRV=7808 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 5 Routing.cxx(196) ROUTING Checking policy VirtualQueue for request Setup CRV=7808 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 5 Routing.cxx(196) ROUTING Checking policy Internal for request Setup CRV=7808 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 5 Routing.cxx(196) ROUTING Checking policy Neighbor for request Setup CRV=7808 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 5 Routing.cxx(196) ROUTING Checking policy ENUM for request Setup CRV=7808 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 5 Routing.cxx(196) ROUTING Checking policy SRV for request Setup CRV=7808 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 5 Routing.cxx(196) ROUTING Checking policy DNS for request Setup CRV=7808 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 3 ProxyChannel.cxx(2374) Q931s No destination for unregistered call 02 33 3c a9 a8 85 82 1b 23 e3 52 23 20 d9 9e 7f from 63.250.160.22:1137 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 4 ProxyChannel.cxx(2426) Q931s Unregistered party is not NATed 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 2 RasTbl.cxx(3565) CallTable::Insert(CALL) Call No. 1, total sessions : 1 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 2 gkacct.cxx(955) GKACCT Successfully logged event 1 for call no. 1 2011/03/10 15:09:05.635 1 RasTbl.cxx(4048) CDR|1|02 33 3c a9 a8 85 82 1b I also did your suggestion: > [RasSrv::ARQFeatures] > ArjReasonRouteCallToGatekeeper=0 and that works. Does the [Routing::Explicit] mapping only accept IP addresses as the right-hand-side? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
