Hi Emmanuel,
you are right, there is no reason not to apply the ENUM policy to
unregistered calls. I made the change in the CVS and also enabled it
for Facility messages.
Regards,
Jan
Emmanuel BUU wrote:
> It seem that ENUM routing policy is not working properly in gnugk 2.3.1.
> Looking at the code in Routing.cxx we have:
>
>
> // a policy to look up the destination from ENUM Name Server
> class ENUMPolicy : public AliasesPolicy {
> public:
> ENUMPolicy() { m_name = "ENUM"; }
> protected:
> virtual bool OnRequest(SetupRequest &) { return false; }
> virtual bool OnRequest(FacilityRequest &) { return false; }
>
> virtual bool FindByAliases(RoutingRequest &,
> H225_ArrayOf_AliasAddress &);
> virtual bool FindByAliases(LocationRequest &,
> H225_ArrayOf_AliasAddress &);
> };
>
>
> In order to make it work, we had to modify it as follow:
>
>
> class ENUMPolicy : public AliasesPolicy {
> public:
> ENUMPolicy() { m_name = "ENUM"; }
> protected:
> // virtual bool OnRequest(SetupRequest &) { return false; }
> virtual bool OnRequest(FacilityRequest &) { return false; }
>
> virtual bool FindByAliases(RoutingRequest &,
> H225_ArrayOf_AliasAddress &);
> virtual bool FindByAliases(LocationRequest &,
> H225_ArrayOf_AliasAddress &);
> };
>
> Emmanuel BUU
> http://www.ives.fr/
--
Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
