Hi Jan, thanks again for the help! I realized that H.460.18 is only supported in the latest release (2.3.1) so that is why I compiled my own version of 2.3.1. This version however has the issues described in my previous email: Registration of endpoints end up in a loop. > However registration for LifeSize and Merial does not go through. The > NATed endpoints send a registrationrequest, receive a positive > registrationConfirm...but try to register again after about 10 seconds Thanks! -Siet -----Original Message----- From: Jan Willamowius [mailto:jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 1:13 PM To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: NAT issues with H245 Hi Siet, support for H.460.18 was added in 2.3.0 and significatly improved in 2.3.1, it won't work in 2.2.7. Sorry, Jan Siet Toorman wrote: > Hi Jan, thank you for the help. > > Reason for using 2.2.7 is that this is the packaged version with Ubuntu. > Compiling the libraries from SVN/CVS head did not work, however the > 'known good' lib combinations from Nov 16 compiles and runs cleanly. > > With this version I am having registration issues unfortunately. I used > the following Routed/proxy config: > > [RoutedMode] > GKRouted=1 > H245Routed=1 > EnableH46018=1 > SupportNATedEndpoints=1 > > [Proxy] > Enable=1 > ProxyForNAT=1 > ProxyForSameNAT=1 > > However registration for LifeSize and Merial does not go through. The > NATed endpoints send a registrationrequest, receive a positive > registrationConfirm...but try to register again after about 10 seconds. > I confirmed this using a packet sniffer at the Endpoint (Wireshark: > http://upload.xandrios.net/gnugk_2.3.1_reregistration_loop.pcap). > > I noticed that a Xmeeting endpoint does get registered. The difference > between Xmeeting and LifeSize is that Xmeeting receives a data=noNAT in > the nonStandardData field. Also, Xmeeting receives a serviceControl > field with a sessionId=0, while Lifesize does not. > > A trace from a successful xmeeting registration from behind NAT can be > found here: > http://upload.xandrios.net/gnugk_2.3.1_registration_xmeeting.pcap > > Any advice on how to continue? > > Thank you! > -Siet > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Willamowius [mailto:jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:38 PM > To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: NAT issues with H245 > > Hi Siet, > > your first step should be to upgrade to GnuGk 2.3.1 and then enable > H.460.18 in GnuGk and all your endpoints. > The only problem will be the Mirial since it doesn't support any NAT > traversal method as far as I know. > > Regards, > Jan > > > Siet Toorman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to create a test setup with GnuGK and Lifesize > conferencing. > > I have the following available: > > > > - GnuGK server on public internet, no NAT no Firewall. > > - Endpoint Lifesize Conference / passport behind NAT > > - Endpoint Lifesize passport behind NAT > > - Endpoint Mirial behind NAT > > - Endpoint PacPhone behind NAT > > > > My Goal is to allow each device to call each other, without the need > to > > open/forward ports at the Endpoint's NAT router. > > > > This works only in case of PacPhone since this supports the NAT > > Traversal functionality. However Mirial is supposed to support H245 > and > > I expected it to be able to overcome the NAT issues that way (?) > > > > I'm using GnuGK v2.2.7 with the following (very basic) config: > > > > [Gatekeeper::Main] > > Fortytwo=42 > > > > [RoutedMode] > > GKRouted=1 > > H245Routed=1 > > SupportNATedEndpoints=1 > > > > [Proxy] > > Enable=1 > > ProxyForNAT=1 > > ProxyForSameNAT=1 > > > > >From what I understand this should route all data (control messages + > > media) through the GK. However when I place a call the GK still tries > to > > connect outwards to the public IP of the Endpoint(s). Since these > ports > > are not forwarded the call fails. > > > > Am I missing something? I would have expected all traffic to be routed > > over the one connection that is setup from the endpoint to the GK. The > > GK connecting to the endpoints does not work due to the NAT router in > > front of them. > > > > All help is greatly appreciated! > > > > Thank you, > > Siet -- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
