Hi all, In the RoutingPolicy, shall we remove "srv" and include its functions in "dns"? After all, SRV is just one of the dns types. As we all know, dns record types includes A, CNAME, TXT, MX, SRV, etc. Maybe we should make the "dns" routing policy to handle various dns types directly. For example, email servers first checks dns for MX record, if no, then it checks for A record, etc. We could make gnugk "dns" routing policy first to check SRV record, if no, then check for A record, then check for CNAME. For backward compatibility, we could leave "srv" in config for a bit, and just treat it as "dns". Just a thought. Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
