Re: Two gatekeepers (public/private) sharing same prefix?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alessandro,

thank you for letting us know about your resolved problem.
Not noise, but signal.

Earl

Alessandro Simonetto wrote:
> Dear All,
> I managed to solve my own problem, and I'm posting the solution to 
> save time to whomever may make the same mistake in the future.
> a) when you set up a child gatekeeper, you must also define it as a 
> neighbor in the parent one...
> somehow I had dropped this section from my configuration file in the 
> course of tests (since I did reach in the past few days the 
> functionality I described, that section must have been present in 
> previous versions of my files)
>
> b) it is perfectly legal to 'delegate' the whole available e.164 
> space to the child.
>
> with these modifications the endpoints registered with the internal 
> gatekeeper can call outside and be called, and the external ones 
> registering with the external gatekeeper can call outside (of course) 
> and also be called as long as the routing policy is 
> internal,neighbor,parent.
>
> Sorry for the noise.
> Best regards
> Alessandro
>
>   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux